CHAPTER
I
INTRODUCTION
A. Background
As proficient readers, it is sometimes easy to forget that
the process of reading is an active one requiring us to make meaning as we go
along. Most of us have been reading for so long—be it reading for pleasure or
reading for learning—that we sometimes forget how far beyond the written page
our reading goes. One of the most difficult skills young readers need to learn
is the skill to read what doesn’t appear in black and white on the written
page. In other words, the skill to infer. In order to infer meaning, readers
must combine the information that the author has written with their own experiences—both
reading experiences and life experiences.
Not only is the process of making
inferences difficult for a beginner, the process of teaching students to make
inferences is not an easy one. And, like so many good reading habits, it
doesn’t come naturally for most of our students. The process has to be
explicitly taught to students, modeled for students, practiced by students.
Eventually, making inferences will become a habit of mind that students will
participate in without hesitation.
B. Formulation of the
Problem
1)
What is inference?
2)
How to make inference?
3)
What is It says ...
I say ... And so Strategy?
C.
Purpose of Writing
1)
To find what inference is
2)
To find how to make inference
3)
To find what It
says ... I say ... And so Strategy is
CHAPTER
II
DISCUSSION
A. Definition of Inference
Inference
is a mental process by which we reach a conclusion based on specific evidence.
Inferences are the stock and trade of detectives examining clues, of doctors
diagnosing diseases, and of car mechanics repairing engine problems. We infer
motives, purpose, and intentions.
Inference
is essential to, and part of, being human. We engage in inference every day. We
interpret actions to be examples of behavior characteristics, intents, or
expressions of particular feelings. We infer it is raining when we see someone
with an open umbrella. We infer people are thirsty if they ask for a glass of
water. We infer that evidence in a text is authoritative when it is attributed
to a scholar in the field.
We want
to find significance. We listen to remarks, and want to make sense of them.
What might the speaker mean? Why is he or she saying that? We go beyond
specific remarks to underlying significance or broader meaning. When we read
that someone cheated on his or her income taxes, we might take that as an
example of financial ingenuity, daring, or stupidity. We seek purposes and
reasons
.
B.
How to Make Inference
Inferences
are not random. While they may come about mysteriously with a sudden jump of
recognition, a sense of "Ah ha!" inferences are very orderly.
Inferences may be guesses, but they are educated guesses based on supporting
evidence. The evidence seems to require that we reach a specific conclusion.
Evidence
is said to imply; reader’s infer. While this image suggests an
intent or power on the part of evidence that does not exist—how, after all, can
a fact compel a certain conclusion?—the image and resulting terminology are
useful nonetheless. The sense of inevitability to the conclusion suggests that
we did not jump to that conclusion or make it up on our own, but found it by
reasoning from the evidence.
The
above image implies that everyone will reach the same conclusion. That
obviously is not the case—as the examples above suggest. The umbrella might be
protection from the sun, the request for water might indicate a need to take a
pill, and a footnote may cite only one side of a controversy. Here again, the
line between inference and jumping to a conclusion can be awfully thin.
|
A man
gets on a bus. What might be implied by each of the following?
He
ran to catch the bus.
He is
carrying a suitcase.
He
asks the driver for change of a $100 bill.
|
Inferences
are not achieved with mathematical rigor. Inferences do not have the certainty
obtained with deductive reasoning. Inferences tend to reflect prior knowledge
and experience as well as personal beliefs and assumptions. Inferences thus
tend to reflect one's stake in a situation or one's interests in the outcome.
People may reason differently or bring different assumptions or premises to
bear.
Given
evidence that PCB's cause cancer in people, and that PCB's are in a particular
water system, all reasonable people would reach the conclusion that that water
system is dangerous to people. But given evidence that there is an increase in
skin cancer among people who sun bathe, not all people would conclude that
sunbathing causes skin cancer. Sun bathing, they might argue, may be
coincidental with exposure to other cancer causing factors.
More
often than not, disagreements are based not on differences in reasoning, but in
the values, assumptions, or information brought to bear. If we believe that all
politicians are crooks, we will infer that a specific politician's actions are
scurrilous. If we believe that politicians act for the good of all, we will
look for some benefit in their actions. Either way, we will try to use reason
to explain the actions. We will look for some coherent explanation as a way of
making sense of things. As we saw earlier, if we can understand why someone
would do something, why someone might say something, why someone might act in a
certain way, we feel we have made sense of the act or statement. It's like a
murder trial: if we can put together opportunity, motive, and means, we can
make a case.
The
more evidence we have before us, and the more carefully we reason, the more
valid our inferences. This principle plays an important role with reading: the
more evidence within a text we incorporate into our interpretation, the more
likely we have not gone astray from any intended meaning.
So,
when we infer, we :
·
Make inferences based on sound reasoning.
·
Use background knowledge to make connections and personalize the reading.
·
Ask internal questions while reading.
·
Make predictions and confirm or discard them as we continue reading.
·
Try to recognize the author’s purpose and message.
·
Make inferences using what is “between our ears.”
C.
It says ... I say
... And so ... Strategy
One of
the most used strategy in making inference is It Says ... I Say ... And So Strategy. It Says ... I Say ... And So is a reading strategy that requires
students to consider questions linked to textual material, find information in
the text that responds to the question, interpret the text using inference
skills, and combine the information from the text and their own thinking to create
an answer. The strategy encourages students to realize that when they create
meaning, they combine their own ideas and thoughts with evidence and details
that they find within a reading selection. The strategy works well with
nonfiction and fiction texts.
Steps:
1. The
strategy works best when a teacher has spent time modeling the process prior to
applying it to content material. Consider using a short and familiar text to
teach the strategy. Teachers who use the strategy suggest beginning with fairy
tales, folk lore, or legends. After modeling the strategy, apply it to a
relevant piece of content area text.
2.
Provide students with a copy of the It Says strategy chart.
|
Questions
|
It Says
|
I Say
|
And so
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Brainstorm possible questions based on the topic to be read. (In the beginning,
you may choose to actually provide the questions. Sometimes questions found at
the end of textbook reading selections are appropriate. As students move toward
a more independent level, they should be able to create their own questions.)
4.
Consider allowing students to work in groups as they learn the strategy.
5.
Students follow the steps in the sample chart (see below):
FIRES IN THE BLACK HILLS CHART
|
Questions
|
It Says
|
I Say
|
And so
|
|
Why
are forest fires on the increase in the
Black
Hills of South
Dakota?
|
For the last several
years, precipitation
amounts from
snowfall have
decreased.
|
Less snowfall
could mean dry
conditions
throughout the
Black Hills.
|
Dry conditions resulting from a decrease in precipitation lead to
conditions that might make fires more likely to occur.
|
CHAPTER III
PRACTICE
By using Its Says ... I Say ... And So ... chart, infer these texts below:
1.
Even
couples with only mild difficulties in communicating can have important
misunderstandings. Marjorie, for example, wanted Ken to invite her to a
favorite cocktail lounge overlooking a bay to celebrate their anniversary. She
archly asked him, “Ken, do you feel like going out for a drink tonight?” Ken,
who was feeling tired, missed the hidden message contained in her question. He
responded, “No, I’m too tired.” Marjorie was extremely disappointed. Only after
feeling hurt and sorry for herself did she realize that she had not
communicated to Ken her real desire – to celebrate their anniversary. When she
later made clear her true wish, he readily agreed to celebrate.
2.
Boori Ma, sweeper of the stairwell, had
not slept in two nights. So the morning before the third night she shook the
mites out of her bedding. She shook the quilts once underneath the letter boxes
where she lived, then once again at the mouth of the alley, causing the crows
who were feeding on vegetable peels to scatter in several directions.
As she started
up the four flights to the roof, Boori Ma kept one hand placed over the knee
that swelled at the start of every rainy season. That meant that her bucket,
quilts, and the bundle of reeds which served as her broom all had to be braced
under one arm. Lately Boori Ma had been thinking that the stairs were getting
steeper; climbing them felt more like climbing a ladder than a staircase. She
was sixty-four years old, with hair in a knot no larger than a walnut, and she
looked almost as narrow from the front as she did from the side.
CHAPTER
IV
CLOSING
A. Conclusion
One of
the most difficult skills young readers need to learn is the skill to infer. In
order to infer meaning, readers must combine the information that the author
has written with their own experiences—both reading experiences and life
experiences.
Inferences
are often referred to as what you ‘read between the lines’. The meaning is really
found ‘between your ears’. Inferences are what the author implies or suggests. The
author wants the reader, to make the jump to the same conclusion the author has
made. When the author implies something, the reader has to infer.
When
we infer, we :
·
Make inferences based on sound reasoning.
·
Use background knowledge to make connections and personalize the reading.
·
Ask internal questions while reading.
·
Make predictions and confirm or discard them as we continue reading.
·
Try to recognize the author’s purpose and message.
·
Make inferences using what is “between our ears.”
To make it easier, we can use Its Says ... I Say ... And So ... strategy.
REFERENCES
ESA. 2006. Strategies to Help Readers Make Meaning through Inferences. South
Dakota : Black Hills Special Service Cooperative (BHSSC).
“Inference: The Process”. Through :
<http://www.criticalreading.com/inference_process.htm>
[20/10/2015]
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar