Sabtu, 15 Oktober 2016

INFERENCES (morphology and syntax)

 DEFINITON AND TYPE OF INFERENCES

            Inference is the act or process of deriving logical conclusions from premises known or assumed to be true. The conclusion drawn is also called an idiomatic. The laws of valid inference are studied in the field of logic. There are several types of inferences :
1.       Terms of qualification
      Terms of qualification include words or phrases that modify the certainty of a writer’s statement. These terms can be used to infer the author’s attitude toward the particular topic. There are four categories of terms of qualification:
•words or phrases that express no doubt
all, always, definitely, clearly
•words or phrases that express little doubt
most, seldom, consistently, rarely
•words or phrases that express some doubt
it seems, apparently, many, it is possible
•words or phrases that express much doubt
supposedly, it is rumored
2.       Terms of connotation
The connotation of a word is its suggested meaning. A critical reader can infer much about an author’s unspoken attitude toward a topic by examining the connotations of his/her word choice.
Many words fall into one of three categories, each of which expresses an implied value:
Positive
Neutral
Negative
home
house
shack
slender
slim
skinny
inquisitive
interested
nosy
youngster
child
brat

1.      A Positive Attitude  :
Words with positive connotations are used to express a positive attitude towards something.
2.      A Neutral Attitude  :
Words with neutral connotations are used to show that an author is not biased about the subject.
3.      A Negative Attitude :
Words with negative connotations are used to express a negative attitude towards something

3.       Term of Metaphors and Similes
Metaphor is a direct comparison of two objects or ideas that do not seem related
Simile is same as metaphor yet uses the words ‘as’ or ‘like’ in the comparison
       To understand a metaphor or simile, you need to identify the two words that are being compared- subject and image. Then you can begin to list the associations the two words together suggest.


Examples of Metaphors :
“His hair was bone white.”
Here, the whiteness of the person's hair is being compared to that of a bone's.
“She is an early bird.”
In this one, the girl is being compared to a bird, because she too gets up early in the morning.
“A heart of stone.”
This metaphor is inferring that the person’s heart is hard, cold, and impermeable like a stone.


Examples of Similes :
Ernest Gaines, the author of the novel A Lesson Before Dying,
uses several similes in his writing.

“His godmother became as immobile as a great stone or as one of our oak or
 cypress stumps.” (p.3)
This quote is comparing the godmother to a large heavy object. It is implying that getting
her to move would take a great amount of effort.
“…the two half-burned logs gave about as much fire as a candle would.” (p. 77)
This compares the burning logs to candle light and implies that the amount of light they
gave off was minimal.
“The leaves were as still as if they were painted there.” (p. 84)
Through this quote the reader can infer that there is not even a breeze. The leaves were
completely still which implies the feeling that the leaves were frozen in time like a painting.

4.       Term of allusion
Allusion is  a direct or indirect reference to something which is presumably commonly
known, such as an event, book, myth, place, or work of art .

      Examples of Allusion in Everyday Speech
The use allusions are not confined to literature alone. Their occurrence is fairly common in our daily speech. Look at some common examples of allusions in everyday life:
“Don’t act like a Romeo in front of her.”
– “Romeo” is a reference to Shakespeare’s Romeo, a passionate lover of Juliet, in “Romeo and Juliet”.
The rise in poverty will unlock the Pandora’s box of crimes.
– This is an allusion to one of Greek Mythology’s origin myth, “Pandora’s box”.
“This place is like a Garden of Eden.”
–This is a biblical allusion to the “garden of God” in the Book of Genesis.
“Hey! Guess who the new Newton of our school is?”
– “Newton”, means a genius student, alludes to a famous scientist Isaac Newton.
“Stop acting like my ex-husband please.”
– Apart from scholarly allusions we refer to common people and places in our speech.
  
5.       Term of Inductions

Induction: A process of reasoning (arguing) which infers a general conclusion based
on individual cases, examples, specific bits of evidence, and other specific
types of premises.
Example: In Chicago last month, a nine-year-old boy died of an asthma attack while
waiting for emergency aid. After their ambulance was pelted by rocks in
an earlier incident, city paramedics wouldn’t risk entering the Dearborn
Homes Project (where the boy lived) without a police escort.
Thus, based on this example, one could inductively reason that the nineyear-
old boy died as a result of having to wait for emergency treatment.
Guidelines for logical and valid induction:
1. When a body of evidence is being evaluated, the conclusion about that
evidence that is the simplest but still covers all the facts is the
best conclusion.
2. The evidence needs to be well-known and understood.
3. The evidence needs to be sufficient. When generalizing from a sample
to an entire population, make sure the sample is large enough to show
a real pattern.
4. The evidence needs to be representative. It should be typical of the
entire population being generalized.

6.       Term of deduction

Deduction: A process of reasoning that starts with a general truth, applies that truth to
a specific case (resulting in a second piece of evidence), and from those
two pieces of evidence (premises), draws a specific conclusion about the
specific case.
Example: Free access to public education is a key factor in the success of industrialized
nations like the United States. (major premise)
India is working to become a successful, industrialized nation. (specific case)
Therefore, India should provide free access to public education for its citizens.
(conclusion)
Thus, deduction is an argument in which the conclusion is said to follow
necessarily from the premise.
Guidelines for logical and valid deduction:
1. All premises must be true.
2. All expressions used in the premises must be clearly and
consistently defined.
3. The first idea of the major premise must reappear in some form as the
second idea in the specific case.
4. No valid deductive argument can have two negative premises.
5. No new idea can be introduced in the conclusion.













References:

·         Induction, Deduction, And The Scientific Method An Eclectic Overview Of The Practice Of Science Irving Rothchild Emeritus Professor Of Reproductive Biology Case Western Reserve University School Of Medicine Cleveland, Ohio
·         www.ssr.org/induction.html
·         www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/itprnn/book.pdf

Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar